Covid restrictions

Peace Bridge red double-helix pedestrian bridge in Calgary, Alberta, Canada
by David Klemt David Klemt No Comments

Restrictions: What’s Different in Alberta?

Restrictions: What’s Different in Alberta?

by David Klemt

Peace Bridge red double-helix pedestrian bridge in Calgary, Alberta, Canada

According to Alberta medical officers, it’s time to begin the transition away from Covid-19 mandates and restrictions.

Taking a transition approach means that some restrictions will remain in place for at least the next several days.

However, operators have reason to be cautiously optimistic regarding the lifting of “nearly all” current restrictions.

What’s Different Now?

Alberta’s chief medical officer of health, Dr. Deena Hinshaw, says Alberta is now in a transition period. The province is attempting to adjust from a pandemic response to an endemic response to Covid-19.

In other words, Alberta authorities are seeking a return to pre-pandemic normalcy. Of course, lifting mandates and adjusting to “normal” life will take time, cautions Dr. Hinshaw.

Premier Jason Kenney says that “now is the time to begin learning to live with Covid.”

Clearly, the biggest change came in the repealing of Alberta’s vaccine passport program. Also known as REP, the Restrictions Exemption Program is no longer in use.

However, a number of restrictions will remain in place until at least March 1.

Restaurant, bar, pub, nightclub, and cafe operators are subject to the following:

  • Capacity limit of 500 for venues with fire occupancy of 500 to 999.
  • Capacity limit of 50 percent for businesses with fire occupancy of 1,000 or more.
  • Liquor service must end at 11:00 PM.
  • In-person service must end at 12:30 PM.
  • Mingling between tables is prohibited.
  • Maximum party capacity per table is ten people.
  • Unfortunately, dancing, darts, billiards, and other “interactive activities” are prohibited.

In better news, both indoor and outdoor dining are permitted. Also, venues with fire occupancy under 500 are no longer subject to capacity limits.

What Else is Changing?

Currently, Alberta is in Step 1 of the province’s plan to ease Covid-19 mandates, restrictions, and measures.

Should all go well—hospitalizations trending downward—the province will enter Step 2:

  • Indoor mask requirement lifted.
  • Indoor and outdoor social gathering restrictions lifted.
  • All large venues and entertainment venues will have capacity restrictions lifted.

Of course, Step 3 will represent the greatest move toward a return to normal life in Alberta. However, there is no date set against entering Step 3.

Should the targets that will trigger the final step in the three-step plan be hit, mandatory isolation will transition from a requirement to a recommendation. In addition, Covid-19-specific continuing care measures will be removed.

Given the possibility of major restrictions lifting in just under a week, operators, their team members, and the guests they serve have reason to be optimistic.

Image: Denisse Leon on Unsplash

Granville Street in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, at night
by David Klemt David Klemt No Comments

Restrictions: What’s Different in BC?

Restrictions: What’s Different in British Columbia?

by David Klemt

Granville Street in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, at night

While face mask and proof-of-vaccine requirements remain in place throughout British Columbia, some Covid-19 restrictions are no more.

“By following the science and looking out for each other, we are now in a position to carefully ease many COVID-19 restrictions,” said BC premier John Horgan last week.

Per reports, the second-dose vaccine rate of eligible residents in BC is over 90 percent. That, along with a dip in hospitalizations, are likely contributing to this easing of restrictions.

Premier Horgan denies that the “Freedom Convoy” protests influenced BC’s decisions.

What’s Different Now?

The most relevant news pertaining to hospitality operators impacts capacity and guest behavior.

Restaurant, bar, lounge, and nightclub operators have reason to feel a sense of relief. This is due to several favorable changes to Covid-19 restrictions.

First, capacity restrictions for the venues above have been lifted. This return to 100-percent capacity is likely the most welcome change for BC operators.

Second, table limits. In short, those are also no more. No longer are parties limited to six guests or less.

The third restriction (at least the order I’m addressing them) is the return of mingling. That’s right—guests can socialize amongst other tables once again.

Fourth, there’s no longer a Covid-19-specific limit dictating liquor service hours.

Fifth, down goes the plexiglass. Operators can remove their plexi barriers. However, given the past two years of restriction whiplash, it could be smart to store and not toss our or destroy them.

Finally, and this is perhaps the greatest return to a semblance of normalcy, dancing is back. For nearly two years, the province of BC has been the town in Footloose. But as of now, guests are free to dance once again.

It’s important to note that workers will follow their employers’ Covid-19 safety plans.

What Else is Changing?

Unfortunately, what’s in the pipeline for further easing of restrictions is unknown.

Currently, masks are required in a restaurant, bar, lounge, or nightclub when a guest isn’t in their seat. Also, guests must still present the BC Vaccine Card for scanning to gain entry. Two doses of an approved vaccine are required.

BC’s Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry, will “revisit” current restrictions on March 15. Dr. Henry will do so again in mid-April.

So, while there is cause for some optimism that life could return to normal in BC by April or May, we simply do not know for sure. Indeed, should another Covid-19 variant lead to a rise in infections and hospitalizations, now-lifted restrictions could conceivably return.

However, while Dr. Henry believes as we do that “hope is not a strategy,” there is room for optimism. With capacity, mingling, and dancing restrictions lifted, operators can once again offer guests a sense of normal life.

Image: Jerry Coli from Pixabay

Toronto, Ontario, Canada skyline viewed from harbor at dusk
by David Klemt David Klemt No Comments

Restrictions: What’s Different in Ontario?

Restrictions: What’s Different in Ontario?

by David Klemt

Toronto, Ontario, Canada skyline viewed from harbor at dusk

Changes involving Covid-19 restrictions have come to the province of Ontario, Canada, the location of the global KRG Hospitality headquarters.

Las Vegas is home to KRG’s American headquarters. The state of Nevada eliminated its indoor mask mandate nearly three weeks ago.

Ontario’s restriction-easing plans should be welcome news for current and future operators throughout the province.

Per Ontario premiers, these changes are due to a reduction in Covid-19 hospitalizations. Reportedly, further pandemic-related changes are due today, with more coming down March 14.

What’s Different Now?

Most notably, indoor capacity restrictions for restaurants and bars are no longer in place. However, this is somewhat nuanced at the moment.

Per the current reading of Ontario’s public health measures, only venues that require proof of vaccination may return to 100-percent indoor capacity.

As the order reads, the following businesses are subject to “no capacity limits [indoors]…where proof of vaccination is required:

  • restaurants, bars and other food or drink establishments without dance facilities;
  • casinos, bingo halls and other gaming establishments;
  • cinemas; and
  • indoor areas of other settings that choose to “opt-in” to proof of vaccination requirements.

Operators of stadiums, arenas, and concert venues may now operate at 50-percent capacity

Nightclubs and other establishments that serve food and/or drink and have “dance facilities” and also require proof of vaccination are restricted to an indoor capacity of 25 percent.

Again, these changes are reportedly temporary. The province’s premiers and several outlets report that Covid-19 restrictions will be lifted further in March.

What Else is Changing?

Clearly, the biggest planned change involves proof of vaccination.

The province of Ontario appears to be embracing optimism. Additionally, one can argue that premiers are choosing to reward Ontarians for helping drive down hospitalization rates.

Should the plan be followed, should hospitalizations not increase, proof-of-vaccination requirements will be lifted March 1. In fact, Ontario’s mandatory vaccine passport system will also be lifted on March 1 if everything goes to plan.

Additionally, indoor capacity limits will return to 100 percent “in all indoor public settings.”

However, on March 1, face coverings and the “active/passive” screening of guests will remain in place. Also, operators can choose to require proof of vaccination voluntarily.

Reporting on what to expect by March 14 is murky. Analyzing Ontario premier Doug Ford’s words regarding these developments may offer a clue.

“We will need to keep masking in place for just a little bit longer,” said Ford. Perhaps Ontario can expect mask requirements to be lifted by or on March 14.

Of course, a certain level of skepticism regarding Ontario’s restriction-lifting plan is justified. Optimism is healthy but it’s not a business strategy.

That said, allowing for cautious optimism, the province’s plans is still welcome news. If Ontarians remain patient and vigilant, life and operations may return to normal in just three to four weeks.

Image: Alex on Unsplash

Four medical face masks on a blue background
by David Klemt David Klemt No Comments

Current Restaurant & Bar Restrictions: USA

Current Restaurant & Bar Restrictions: USA

by David Klemt

Four medical face masks on a blue background

According to reporting worldwide, the Omicron variant of Covid-19 is surging and accounting for the majority of new infections.

Scientists, medical professionals, and some lawmakers and politicians are expressing concern. This is due to Omicron apparently being much more transmissible in comparison to other variants.

So far, it appears the current administration isn’t suggesting lockdowns. The CDC isn’t recommending restaurants and bars close down.

And dozens of states are not—for now—imposing new restrictions on people and businesses. However, there are nearly 20 states that have restrictions in place for restaurants and bars currently.

Of course, this situation is fluid and subject to change on a whim. As of the date of publication for this article, this is the currents state of the USA.

No Restrictions

There are, so far, 31 states have no state-mandated restrictions in place:

  1. Alabama
  2. Alaska
  3. Arizona
  4. Arkansas
  5. Delaware
  6. Florida
  7. Georgia
  8. Idaho
  9. Indiana
  10. Iowa
  11. Kentucky
  12. Louisiana
  13. Maine
  14. Michigan
  15. Minnesota
  16. Mississippi
  17. Montana
  18. New Hampshire
  19. New Jersey
  20. North Dakota
  21. Oklahoma
  22. Pennsylvania (Note: Indoor diners must wear masks. Businesses can require proof of vaccination.)
  23. Rhode Island
  24. South Carolina
  25. South Dakota
  26. Tennessee
  27. Texas
  28. Utah
  29. Vermont
  30. West Virginia
  31. Wyoming

Your state may be on this list. If so, it’s still important to remain knowledgeable of current restrictions and guidelines in your area(s) of operation.

Restrictions

The following 19 states have restrictions in place. Most commonly, these are mask requirements for indoor diners.

  1. California: Indoor diners must show proof of vaccination in Los Angeles and San Francisco. Regardless of vaccine status, indoor diners must wear masks.
  2. Connecticut: Unvaccinated required to wear masks indoors.
  3. Colorado: All indoor diners must wear masks. In Boulder County, businesses can apply to receive an indoor mask exemption if they require proof of vaccination.
  4. Hawaii: All indoor diners must wear masks.
  5. Illinois: All indoor diners must wear masks.
  6. Kansas: Requirements vary by county for indoor dining, so check current local guidelines.
  7. Maryland: Requirements vary by county for indoor dining, so check current local guidelines.
  8. Massachusetts: In Boston, indoor diners must wear masks regardless of vaccination status.
  9. Missouri: Requirements vary by county for indoor dining, so check current local guidelines.
  10. Nebraska: Requirements vary by county for indoor dining, so check current local guidelines.
  11. Nevada: Requirements vary by county but for the most part, all indoor diners must wear masks.
  12. New Mexico: All indoor diners must wear masks.
  13. New York: Indoor diners must show proof of vaccination, and masks are required to dine indoors. Unvaccinated required to wear masks indoors.
  14. North Carolina: Requirements vary by county for indoor dining, so check current local guidelines.
  15. Ohio: Requirements vary by county for indoor dining, so check current local guidelines.
  16. Oregon: All indoor diners must wear masks. If physical distancing isn’t possible in outdoor areas, masks must be worn by outdoor guests as well.
  17. Virginia: All indoor diners must wear masks.
  18. Washington: All indoor diners must wear masks.
  19. Wisconsin: Requirements vary by county for indoor dining, so check current local guidelines.

So Far, No Lockdowns

Some restaurants and bars have closed temporarily. These decisions are fueled by myriad factors, including spikes in infections in their markets or staff testing positive for Covid. So far, many of these businesses plan to reopen a day or two before New Year’s Eve.

It may be difficult to be optimistic at the moment. However, more than 70 percent of Americans have received one dose of an approved vaccine. Over 60 percent have received two doses. And nearly 20 percent have received a booster.

While alarmed, reporting shows that scientists and medical professionals aren’t anticipating nationwide lockdowns.

Image: Tamanna Rumee on Unsplash

by David Klemt David Klemt No Comments

Los Angeles Restaurants Face New Outdoor Dining Restrictions

After Weeks of Prohibition, This is What Los Angeles Restaurants are Facing

by David Klemt

Limited to delivery and takeout for several weeks, Los Angeles restaurants and breweries may now offer outdoor dining.

Of course, that easing of restrictions comes with a raft of new limitations.

The outdoor dining ban was lifted last Friday, January 29. Governor Gavin Newsom rescinded California’s statewide stay-at-home order four days prior, January 25.

Operators, still caught firmly in the vortex of opens, closures and ever-shifting restrictions, will have to weigh the potential to generate in-person dining revenue against limitations and costs.

Outdoor dining capacity of restaurants, breweries and wineries (able to open for outdoor tastings) is restricted to 50 percent. Even an operator with a significant outdoor footprint may find the revenue generated from in-person dining incapable of offsetting associated costs.

Speaking of footprint, operators must also contend with new distance requirements. Outdoor tables must now be spaced a minimum of eight feet apart to ensure guests aren’t seated back to back. This increase from six feet must be measured from the edges of each table.

Any employee who “may come in contact” with a guest is required to wear a face mask and a face shield for the duration of such an interaction, which can’t include tableside preparations.

No live entertainment is permitted, and televisions must remain turned off. Couple the television ban with a prohibition on “coordinated, organized or invited events or gatherings” and Super Bowl parties are clearly not permitted.

Additional limitations pertain to guests and group size. No more than six people may be seated at a table, and each guest must be a member of the same household. Signage informing guests of the household requirement must be posted, and guests must also be given this information verbally.

A “household” in Los Angeles County is defined as “persons living together as a single living unit.” Click here for the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health’s “Protocol for Restaurants, Breweries and Wineries: Appendix I.”

According to Dr. Barbara Ferrer, Los Angeles County health director, operators can expect increased scrutiny and enforcement of Covid-19 protocols.

Evidence of enhanced enforcement efforts was seen last week. LA County filed two suits on January 27 against Cronies Sports Grill in Agoura Hills and Tinhorn Flats in Burbank for failing to adhere to health directives. Both suits label the establishments as “public nuisances.”

Some Los Angeles operators may find limited outdoor dining better than no in-person dining at all. However, others may conclude that labor and PPE costs alone aren’t worth restricted reopening, to say nothing of contending with increased governmental scrutiny.

Image: David Mark from Pixabay

Top