2026: Animals vs. Plants?
by David Klemt

Gourmet dining experience featuring Canadian beef.
According to Datassential, plant-based meat and seafood alternatives have reached a plateau, meaning that animal meats should go hard in 2026.
Last September, the F&B intelligence platform surveyed 993 consumers who eat both animal and plant-based meats. Most indicated that they were more interested in the former than the latter.
There are three primary factors driving this sentiment, per Datassential. The top factor is how natural one category is in comparison to the other. Second is versatility. And third, which is perhaps the most important to operators with food programs, is craveability.
More Natural
Of the 993 survey respondents, 65 percent indicated that animal meat is more natural to consume than its plant-based counterparts. This appears to be the top concern or motivating factor, as it represents the greatest sentiment per respondents.
This does make some sense, at least to me. Over the past several years I’ve heard variations of this point of view at restaurants, inside kitchens, in discussions with F&B peers, while speaking with clients, and at trade shows. A common misgiving can be summed up thusly: “We don’t know exactly what they’re putting in these products.”
That doesn’t bode well for overall consumer perception.
More Versatile
Survey respondents also expressed that they feel animal meats are more versatile than plant-based alternatives. In fact, 61 percent shared that opinion.
Again, I’ve heard variations of this statement several times, and I’m sure I’m not the only one. You’ll hear “But what do I do with it?” at trade shows where there are plant-based brands exhibiting at booths and doing demos.
More Craveable
Finally, craveability. This is an interesting one. Nearly 60 percent of respondents (59%) stated that they crave animal meat on a regular basis. On its own, that’s not an incredible stat. However, that majority opinion consists of people who don’t follow through on that craving.
In other words, even people who don’t eat animal meat regularly feel its pull. That doesn’t necessarily include people who adhere to vegetarian or vegan diets, but it’s possible.
More Meat
Along with this comes some insight into consumption habits. Per the Datassential survey, 37 percent of respondents increased their consumption of animal meat more than they boosted their intake of plant-based counterparts.
This is logical when we take the three sentiments above into account as a whole. If something is more natural, more versatile, and more craveable, it stands to reason consumers are going to choose to consume it, and even consume more of it more often.
It’s also possible this increase relates to consumer interest in proteinmaxxing.
More Choices
So, where does this leave operators and their food programs?
Well, it leaves them needing to make programming, menu, and inventory choices.
Datassential suggests that plant-based meats have plateaued in the retail space. It certainly seems that consumer sentiment toward plant-based meats has also plateaued among consumers, based on their survey results.
However, that doesn’t mean operators should abandon plant-based meats and altogether. The better, more intentional approach is to run reports, analyze the data, and make choices with surgical, informed precision.
What do the numbers indicate? Are plant-based meats lagging, and are they taking up valuable inventory space? If orders for plant-based meats are declining, what do sales for “center-of-plate” vegetables look like? What can be leaned into harder, what can be adjusted, and what should be removed?
And, crucially: Are the choices for moving forward being made in a well-considered, intentional manner, or are they just knee-jerk reactions and guesses?
It’s worth noting that Datassential’s consumer sentiment survey focuses on plant-based meats, not just plants. The survey respondents didn’t indicate a decline in interest for items like cauliflower or portobello steaks.
Whatever choices are made, operators need to leverage data and facts, and follow the Three Ps: People, Processes, and Profits.
Image: Deane Bayas via Pexels

